A Brief Sketch on a Theology of Pets and Animals

Should I not have compassion on Nineveh, the great city in which there are more than 120,000 persons who do not know the difference between their right and left hand, as well as many animals?” –Jonah 4:11

Animals have become too humanized. They deserve respect, care, and love, indeed. They serve as companions, and as a source of comfort and release (and sometimes terror). But at the end of the day, they aren’t human beings. They have their rightful place in an “order of being,” but that order cannot (should not) supplant the value of a human being vis a vis God. I’m not suggesting that a family pet doesn’t become “part of the family,” they often do. But I am asserting that animals are inherently worth less than human beings. But as with everything else, sin disorders the way we operate as fallen beings. As such we ascribe and project value upon things, that in their proper order before God, don’t deserve that value, per se. Family pets, particularly dogs and cats, have a certain stability and unconditional love type of loyalty for their owners. And in this sense, they can offer things to people that make them seem more valuable than what humans can offer. But by implication, this ends up dehumanizing humans whilst humanizing pets into an image that we declare valuable; indeed, towards meeting our perceived needs and desires.

Understand, I’m only making my observations on a relative continuum. I’m not targeting folks who have pets, and love their pets as part of the family. I’m just targeting an imbalance that has crept into the broader cultural psychology, relative to an imbalance that has most certainly obtained, in regard to the valuation of animals juxtaposed with the valuation of other human beings. That is to say, more biblically: that humans are created and recreated in the image of God, who is the image of Christ for us. As long as we keep this theological order in mind, we will approach animals/pets with the right type of contextual order that God has declared both good and then VERY good. In our profane society we often see people replacing having babies with, as the alternative, having pets; as if there is a one-for-one correspondence between the two. All I’m saying with my post here, is that biblically, this ultimately is not the case.

Athanasian Reformed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *